| Score Descriptor Table |
| Score Descriptors |
Listening Section |
Score |
Strength |
Weakness |
495~375 |
・They can infer the central idea, purpose, and basic
context of short spoken exchanges across a broad
range of vocabulary, even when conversational
responses are indirect or not easy to predict.
・They can infer the central idea, purpose, and basic
context of extended spoken texts across a broad
range of vocabulary. They can do this even when the
information is not supported by repetition or
paraphrase and when it is necessary to connect
information across the text.
・They can understand details in short spoken
exchanges, even when negative constructions are
present, when the language is syntactically complex,
or when difficult vocabulary is used.
・They can understand details in extended spoken
texts, even when it is necessary to connect
information
across the text and when this information
is not supported
by repetition. They can understand
details when the
information is paraphrased or when
negative constructions are present. |
|
| Test takers who receive a score at this level typically have weaknesses only when uncommon grammar or vocabulary is used. |
|
370~275 |
・They can sometimes infer the central idea, purpose,
and basic context of short spoken exchanges,
especially when the vocabulary is not difficult.
・They can understand the central idea, purpose, and
basic context of extended spoken texts when this
information is supported by repetition or paraphrase.
・They can understand details in short spoken
exchanges when easy or medium-level vocabulary is
used.
・They can understand details in extended spoken
texts when the information is supported by repetition
and when the requested information comes at the
beginning or end of the spoken text. They can
understand details when the information is
slightly paraphrased. |
|
・They have difficulty understanding the central idea,
purpose, and basic context of short spoken
exchanges when conversational responses are
indirect or difficult to predict or when the vocabulary is
difficult.
・They do not understand the central idea, purpose,
and basic context of extended spoken texts when it
is
necessary to connect information within the text or
when difficult vocabulary is used.
・They do not understand details in short spoken
exchanges when language is syntactically complex
or when difficult vocabulary is used. They do not
usually understand details that include negative
constructions.
・They do not understand details in extended spoken
texts when it is necessary to connect information
across the text or when the information is not
supported by repetition. They do not understand
most paraphrased information or difficult
grammatical constructions. |
|
270~5 |
・They can understand short (single-sentence)
descriptions of the central idea of a photograph.
・They can sometimes understand the central idea,
purpose, and basic context of extended spoken texts
when this information is supported by a lot of
repetition and easy vocabulary.
・They can understand details in short spoken
exchanges and descriptions of photographs when
the vocabulary is easy and when there is only a
small amount of text that must be understood.
・They can understand details in extended spoken
texts when the requested information comes at the
beginning or end of the text and when it matches the
words in the spoken text.
*Test takers who score below 170 may have some of
the same strengths as test takers who score around
200, but their performance is likely to be less
consistent.
Test takers who score around 200 typically have the
strengths described in the box above. |
|
・They do not understand the central idea, purpose, or
basic context of short spoken exchanges, even when
the language is direct and no unexpected
information is present.
・They do not understand the central idea, purpose,
and basic context of extended spoken texts when it
is
necessary to connect information across the text
or when the vocabulary is somewhat difficult.
・They do not understand details in short spoken
exchanges when somewhat difficult vocabulary is
used or when the language is syntactically complex.
They do not understand details that include negative
constructions.
・They do not understand details in extended spoken
texts when the requested information is heard in the
middle of the text. They do not understand
paraphrased information or difficult grammatical
constructions. |
|
Reading Section |
Score |
Strength |
Weakness |
495~425 |
・They can infer the central idea and purpose of a
written text, and they can make inferences about
details.
・They can read for meaning. They can understand
factual information, even when it is paraphrased.
・They can connect information across an entire text,
and they can make connections between two related
texts.
・They can understand a broad range of vocabulary,
unusual meanings of common words, and idiomatic
usage. They can also make distinctions between the
meanings of closely related words.
・They can understand rule-based grammatical
structures. They can also understand difficult,
complex, and uncommon grammatical
constructions. |
|
| Test takers who score around 450 typically have weaknesses only when the information tested is particularly dense or involves difficult vocabulary. |
|
420~325 |
・They can infer the central idea and purpose of a
written text, and they can make inferences about
details.
・They can read for meaning. They can understand
factual information, even when it is paraphrased.
・They can connect information across a small area
within a text, even when the vocabulary and grammar
of the text are difficult.
・They can understand medium-level vocabulary.
They can sometimes understand difficult vocabulary
in context, unusual meanings of common words,
and idiomatic usage.
・They can understand rule-based grammatical
structures. They can also understand difficult,
complex, and uncommon grammatical
constructions. |
|
・They do not connect information across a wide area
within a text.
・They do not consistently understand difficult
vocabulary, unusual meanings of common words, or
idiomatic usage. They usually cannot make
distinctions between the meanings of closely related
words. |
|
320~225 |
・They can make simple inferences based on a
limited amount of text.
・They can locate the correct answer to a factual
question when the language of the text matches the
information that is required. They can sometimes
answer a factual question when the answer is a
simple paraphrase of the information in the text.
・They can sometimes connect information within one
or two sentences.
・They can understand easy vocabulary, and they can
sometimes understand medium-level vocabulary.
・They can understand common, rule-based
grammatical structures. They can make correct
grammatical choices, even when other features of
language, such as difficult vocabulary or the need to
connect information, are present. |
|
・They do not understand inferences that require
paraphrase or connecting information.
・They have a very limited ability to understand factual
information expressed as a paraphrase using
difficult vocabulary. They often depend on finding
words and phrases in the text that match the same
words and phrases in the question.
・They usually do not connect information beyond two
sentences.
・They do not understand difficult vocabulary, unusual
meanings of common words, or idiomatic usage.
They usually cannot make distinctions between the
meanings of closely related words.
・They do not understand more-difficult, complex, or
uncommon grammatical constructions. |
|
220~5 |

・They can locate the correct answer to a factual
question when not very much reading is necessary
and when the language of the text matches the
information that is required.
・They can understand easy vocabulary and common
phrases.
・They can understand the most-common, rule-based
grammatical structures when not very much reading
is necessary.
*Test takers who score below 120 may have some of
the same strengths as test takers who score around
150, but their performance is likely to be less
consistent.Test takers who score around 150
typically have the strengths described in the box
above. |

・They cannot make inferences about information in
written texts.
・They do not understand paraphrased factual
information. They rely on matching words and
phrases in the text to answer questions.
・They are often unable to connect information even
within a single sentence.
・They understand only a limited range of vocabulary.
・They do not understand even easy grammatical
constructions when other language features,
such as difficult vocabulary or the need to connect
information, are also required. |
|